Pacheco v. Walmart Inc

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided July 14, 2025·No. 2:24-cv-01551·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 EVELYN RENEE PACHECO, 6 Case No.: 2:24-cv-01551-GMN-NJK Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 [Docket No. 38] 9 WALMART INC., Defendant. 10 11 Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulation to extend the deadline to submit their 12]| joint pretrial order, Docket No. 38, which is GRANTED.! 13 Accordingly, the parties’ deadline to file their joint pretrial order is extended to September 14] 12, 2025. 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 Dated: July 14, 2025 17 a . Nancy Koppe 18 United States Magistrate Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 ——— ' The parties refer to the undersigned as “Magistrate Nancy Koppe.” See Docket No. 38 at 2. There are no “magistrates” in the federal system and there have not been any for three decades. E.g., Dixon v. YIst, 990 F.2d 478, 480 n.1 (9th Cir. 1993). “The title was changed from ‘magistrate’ 27| to ‘magistrate judge’” in 1990. Jd. “[A] magistrate judge may be appropriately called magistrate judge or judge, but not magistrate.” Williams v. City of Mesa, Case No. CV-09-1511-PHX-LOA, 28] 2010 WL 2803880, at *2 n.1 (D. Ariz. July 15, 2010).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pacheco v. Walmart Inc, (D. Nev. 2025).

Pacheco v. Walmart Inc (Pacheco v. Walmart Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bobby Marion Dixon v. Eddie Ylst
990 F.2d 478 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)