Pacheco v. Walmart Inc

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedJanuary 13, 2025
Docket2:24-cv-01551
StatusUnknown

This text of Pacheco v. Walmart Inc (Pacheco v. Walmart Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pacheco v. Walmart Inc, (D. Nev. 2025).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 EVELYN RENEE PACHECO., 7 Case No.: 2:24-cv-01551-GMN-NJK Plaintiff, 8 Order v. 9 [Docket No. 23] WALMART INC., 10 Defendant. 11 12 Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulation to extend discovery deadlines by 30 13 days. Docket No. 23. 14 A request to extend unexpired deadlines in the scheduling order must be premised on a 15 showing of good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4); Local Rule 26-3. The good cause analysis turns 16 on whether the subject deadlines cannot reasonably be met despite the exercise of diligence. 17 Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992). 18 Here, the parties have failed to demonstrate diligence. The Court issued the scheduling 19 order in this case on September 20, 2024. Docket No. 16. Nonetheless, the parties waited until 20 the end of November to conduct any discovery at all, and have conducted little affirmative 21 discovery. Docket No. 23 at 2. 22 Additionally, the instant stipulation fails to meet the requirements of the local rules. The 23 parties do not provide a specific description of the discovery that remains to be completed, see 24 Local Rule 26-3(b); instead, the parties submit that the discovery to be completed includes 25 “additional written discovery as needed…expert disclosures and depositions…depositions of 26 percipient witnesses.” Docket No. 23 at 2. 27 Nonetheless, as a one-time courtesy, the Court will allow a 30-day extension. 28 ] Accordingly, the stipulation to extend is GRANTED. Docket No. 23. 2 Deadlines are RESET as follows: 3 e Initial expert: February 24, 2025 4 e Rebuttal expert: March 26, 2025 5 e Discovery cutoff: April 28, 2025 6 e Dispositive motions: May 28, 2025 7 e Joint proposed pretrial order: June 27, 2025, 30 days after resolution of dispositive 8 motions or further order of the Court 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: January 13, 2025 < x Nancy JNkoppe 12 United’States. Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pacheco v. Walmart Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pacheco-v-walmart-inc-nvd-2025.