Pace v. Pace

94 S.E.2d 819, 244 N.C. 698, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 495
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 31, 1956·No. 392·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

At the threshold- of this appeal it is noted that the pleadings are not contained in the record filed in this Court. Pleadings are a necessary part of the record proper upon appeal — Rule 19, Section 1, of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, at page 553. And Rule 20 of Rules of Practice provides that “Memoranda of pleadings will not be received or recognized in the Supreme Court as pleadings, even by consent.” Failure to send up necessary parts of the record proper has uniformly resulted in dismissal of the appeal. See among others S. v. Lumber Co., 207 N.C. 47, 175 S.E. 713, and cases cited. See also Shepard’s North Carolina Citations, headnote 1, of S. v. Dumber Co., supra, including Griffin v. Barnes, 242 N.C. 306, 87 S.E. 2d 560.

Nevertheless, in the light of the public policy of this State that a father shall provide necessary support for his minor children, “a duty he may not shirk, contract away, or transfer to another,” Ritchie v. White, 225 N.C. 450, 35 S.E. 2d 414, error in the order of 4 August, 1956, is not made to appear.

Appeal dismissed.

Johnson, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pace v. Pace, 94 S.E.2d 819, 244 N.C. 698, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 495 (N.C. 1956).

94 S.E.2d 819 (Pace v. Pace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Williams
437 S.E.2d 884 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1994)
Medley v. North Carolina Department of Correction
412 S.E.2d 654 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1992)
Chapman v. State
340 S.E.2d 237 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Goodyear v. Goodyear
126 S.E.2d 113 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
Mooneyham v. Mooneyham
107 S.E.2d 66 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)