Paccione v. Heritage

371 U.S. 17, 83 S. Ct. 61, 9 L. Ed. 2d 50, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 534
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 8, 1962
Docket98, Misc
StatusPublished

This text of 371 U.S. 17 (Paccione v. Heritage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paccione v. Heritage, 371 U.S. 17, 83 S. Ct. 61, 9 L. Ed. 2d 50, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 534 (1962).

Opinion

371 U.S. 17 (1962)

PACCIONE
v.
HERITAGE, WARDEN.

No. 98, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 8, 1962.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

Petitioner pro se.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene and David Rubin for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. Upon the suggestion of the Solicitor General and an examination of the entire record, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings in which the petitioner is to be accorded the opportunity to present oral argument on the merits of his appeal, either personally or through counsel, to the same extent as such opportunity is accorded to the United States Attorney.

MR. JUSTICE GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paccione v. Heritage
371 U.S. 17 (Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
371 U.S. 17, 83 S. Ct. 61, 9 L. Ed. 2d 50, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paccione-v-heritage-scotus-1962.