Pablo Langaman, Jr. v. Associates Financial Services Company of Hawaii, Inc.

647 F.2d 11, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 13252
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 15, 1981·No. 77-2403·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER ON REHEARING

Before CHAMBERS, WALLACE and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

We granted a rehearing to permit further briefing on the issue of the dating of the insurance authorization form. Briefs have been received from the parties and a review of them and of the record indicates that there was substantial compliance, with respect to the dating requirements of Regulation Z, in this case. We reaffirm our position stated in our order affirming. 616 F.2d 1164.

The appellee’s motion to strike a letter submitted by counsel for appellant is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pablo Langaman, Jr. v. Associates Financial Services Company of Hawaii, Inc., 647 F.2d 11, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 13252 (9th Cir. 1981).

647 F.2d 11 (Pablo Langaman, Jr. v. Associates Financial Services Company of Hawaii, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related