Pablo Langaman, Jr. v. Associates Financial Services Company of Hawaii, Inc.
This text of 647 F.2d 11 (Pablo Langaman, Jr. v. Associates Financial Services Company of Hawaii, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER ON REHEARING
Before CHAMBERS, WALLACE and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
We granted a rehearing to permit further briefing on the issue of the dating of the insurance authorization form. Briefs have been received from the parties and a review of them and of the record indicates that there was substantial compliance, with respect to the dating requirements of Regulation Z, in this case. We reaffirm our position stated in our order affirming. 616 F.2d 1164.
The appellee’s motion to strike a letter submitted by counsel for appellant is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
647 F.2d 11, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 13252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pablo-langaman-jr-v-associates-financial-services-company-of-hawaii-ca9-1981.