Pablo Langaman, Jr. v. Associates Financial Services Company of Hawaii, Inc.

616 F.2d 1164, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 18751
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 11, 1980
Docket77-2403
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 616 F.2d 1164 (Pablo Langaman, Jr. v. Associates Financial Services Company of Hawaii, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pablo Langaman, Jr. v. Associates Financial Services Company of Hawaii, Inc., 616 F.2d 1164, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 18751 (9th Cir. 1980).

Opinion

Appellant Langaman filed this action against the appellee, his creditor, for violation of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601 et seq. He claimed that the creditor’s failure to disclose the effect of an acceleration clause on the finance charge violated the Act and violated Federal Reserve Board Regulation Z (12 C.F.R. § 226.1 et seq.).

We withdrew this case from submission to await the Supreme Court’s ruling on the subject. In Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Milhollin, - U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 790, 63 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980), the Supreme Court ruled that such failure of disclosure is not a violation of the Act or of Regulation Z, thus overruling St. Germain v. Bank of Hawaii, 573 F.2d 572 (9th Cir. 1977) and Kessler v. Associates Financial Services Co., 573 F.2d 577 (9th Cir. 1977).

The parties will bear their own costs on appeal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
616 F.2d 1164, 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 18751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pablo-langaman-jr-v-associates-financial-services-company-of-hawaii-ca9-1980.