P. J. Carlin Construction Co. v. Heaney

298 U.S. 637, 56 S. Ct. 677
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in P. J. Carlin Construction Co. v. Heaney. Read the opinion of the Court — 299 U.S. 41
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 6, 1936·No. No. 817·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a) Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937); Citizens National Bank v. Durr, 257 U. S. 99, 106; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6; Indian Territory Co. v. Board of Equalization, 287 U. S. 573; Lewis v. New York, 289 U. S. 709. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for a writ of certiorari, § 237 (c), Judicial Code as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

P. J. Carlin Construction Co. v. Heaney, 298 U.S. 637, 56 S. Ct. 677 (1936).

298 U.S. 637 (P. J. Carlin Construction Co. v. Heaney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. City of Carrollton
252 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Citizens Nat. Bank of Cincinnati v. Durr
257 U.S. 99 (Supreme Court, 1921)
Lewis v. New York
289 U.S. 709 (Supreme Court, 1933)