Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Board of Equalization

287 U.S. 573
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 7, 1932·No. No. 356; No. 357·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeals herein are dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937); Citizens National Bank v. Durr, 257 U. S. 99, 106, 107; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 4, 5, 6. Treating the papers whereon the appeals in these [574]*574causes were allowed as petitions for writs of certiorari, § 237 (c), Judicial Code as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), consideration thereof is postponed and leave is granted to petitioners to file briefs supporting applications for certiorari within fifteen days, with ten days for opposing counsel to reply.

Messrs. John H. Miley and Wm. P. Mc-Ginnis for appellant. Mr. Hugh Webster for the Board of Equalization of Tulsa County. Messrs. Ernest F. Jenkins and Guy L. Horton for the Board of County Commissioners of Payne County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Board of Equalization, 287 U.S. 573 (1932).

287 U.S. 573 (Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Board of Equalization) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Cook
327 U.S. 474 (Supreme Court, 1946)
Charleston Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Alderson
324 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1945)
P. J. Carlin Construction Co. v. Heaney
298 U.S. 637 (Supreme Court, 1936)
Baltimore National Bank v. State Tax Commission
296 U.S. 538 (Supreme Court, 1935)
Lewis v. New York
289 U.S. 709 (Supreme Court, 1933)