Oz v. Warter

943 So. 2d 287, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19942, 2006 WL 3422370
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 29, 2006·No. No. 3D05-2578·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979); C & M Ventures, Inc. v. Wolf, 587 So.2d 512 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991), review denied, 599 So.2d 661 (Fla.1992); Post Tensioned Eng’g Corp. v. Fairways Plaza Assocs., 412 So.2d 871 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), review denied, 419 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1982).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oz v. Warter, 943 So. 2d 287, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 19942, 2006 WL 3422370 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

943 So. 2d 287 (Oz v. Warter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wahiduzzman v. Florida Unemployment Appeals
943 So. 2d 287 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)