Oxweld Acetylene Co. v. Hastings
71 Pa. Super. 178, 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 56
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 28, 1919
DocketAppeal, No. 41
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases
This text of 71 Pa. Super. 178 (Oxweld Acetylene Co. v. Hastings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oxweld Acetylene Co. v. Hastings, 71 Pa. Super. 178, 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 56 (Pa. Ct. App. 1919).
Opinion
The judgment in this case is affirmed for the reasons given by the court below in its opinion making absolute the rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lloyd & Elliott, Inc. v. Lang
180 A. 71 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
East Coast Fi. Corp. v. Linck
159 A. 468 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Metropolitan Refining Co. v. Beaver Valley Mill Supply Co.
14 Pa. D. & C. 454 (Beaver County Court of Common Pleas, 1930)
Union Car Advertising Co. v. Young
95 Pa. Super. 223 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Gross v. Exeter Machine Works, Inc.
121 A. 195 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)
Colt Co. v. Evans
74 Pa. Super. 73 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 Pa. Super. 178, 1919 Pa. Super. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oxweld-acetylene-co-v-hastings-pasuperct-1919.