Owens v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Owens v. State

355 S.W.3d 508, 2011 WL 6210259

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 18, 2011

DocketED 96155

StatusPublished

This text of 355 S.W.3d 508 (Owens v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Owens v. State, 355 S.W.3d 508, 2011 WL 6210259 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Corey J. Owens, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Corey J. Owens, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

355 S.W.3d 508, 2011 WL 6210259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-state-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack