Owens v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Owens v. State

355 S.W.3d 508, 2011 WL 6210259

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 2011·No. ED 96155·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Corey J. Owens, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Corey J. Owens, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an eviden-tiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Owens v. State, 355 S.W.3d 508, 2011 WL 6210259 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

355 S.W.3d 508 (Owens v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related