Owens v. Patent Scaffolding Co.

50 A.D.2d 866, 376 N.Y.S.2d 948, 18 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 699, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11745
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 22, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 866 (Owens v. Patent Scaffolding Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Owens v. Patent Scaffolding Co., 50 A.D.2d 866, 376 N.Y.S.2d 948, 18 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 699, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

— In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., based upon a breach of warranty, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 29, 1974, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, "with prejudice”, on the ground that the causes of action therein were barred by the Statute of Limitations. Order reversed, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. Defendant’s time to answer the complaint is extended until 20 days after entry of the order to be made hereon. We find no warrant for applying the restrictive four-year Statute of Limitations specified in section 2-725 of the Uniform Commercial Code to an action for breach of implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for use in connection with the rental of the scaffold here in question. We hold, instead, that the six-year limitation period, relating to contracts in general, applies (CPLR 213, subd 2). The broadening application of such warranties to business transactions beyond those of sales per se (see Murray, Under the [867]*867Spreading Analogy of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, 39 Fordham L Rev 447) is irrelevant to the issue of limitation periods. We see no reason to apply a more restrictive limitation period than that provided in CPLR 213 (subd 2) merely because warranties in the lease of a chattel are held to be analogous to warranties relating to sales under the Uniform Commercial Code. Rabin, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Hargett and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holbrook, Inc. v. Link-Belt Construction Equipment Co.
103 Wash. App. 279 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2000)
Holbrook v. LINK-BELT CONST. EQUIPMENT
12 P.3d 638 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 2000)
Salt Lake City Corp. v. Kasler Corp.
855 F. Supp. 1560 (D. Utah, 1994)
Long Island Lighting Co. v. Imo Industries Inc.
6 F.3d 876 (Second Circuit, 1993)
Winckel v. Atlantic Rentals & Sales, Inc.
159 A.D.2d 124 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Tittle v. Steel City Oldsmobile GMC Truck, Inc.
544 So. 2d 883 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1989)
Cucchi v. Rollins Protective Services Co.
546 A.2d 1131 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)
Baker v. Promark Products West, Inc.
692 S.W.2d 844 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1985)
New England Power Co. v. Riley Stoker Corp.
477 N.E.2d 1054 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1985)
Xerox Corp. v. Hawkes
475 A.2d 7 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1984)
Uniflex, Inc. v. Olivetti Corp. of America
86 A.D.2d 538 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
RW Murray Co. v. Shatterproof Glass Corp.
529 F. Supp. 297 (E.D. Missouri, 1981)
The City Of New York v. Pullman Incorporated
662 F.2d 910 (Second Circuit, 1981)
City of New York v. Pullman Inc.
662 F.2d 910 (Second Circuit, 1981)
FIRE DIST. NO. 9, ETC. v. American La France
424 A.2d 441 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1980)
Knox v. North American Car Corp.
399 N.E.2d 1355 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1980)
Shapiro v. Long Island Lightning Co.
71 A.D.2d 671 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Holdridge v. Heyer-Schulte Corp. of Santa Barbara
440 F. Supp. 1088 (N.D. New York, 1977)
Industralease Automated & Scientific Equipment Corp. v. R. M. E. Enterprises, Inc.
58 A.D.2d 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 A.D.2d 866, 376 N.Y.S.2d 948, 18 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 699, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11745, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-v-patent-scaffolding-co-nyappdiv-1975.