Owens v. Keyser

S.D. New York

Owens v. Keyser

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided May 13, 2021·No. 1:18-cv-11638·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICKY OWENS, Petitioner, 18 CIVIL 11638 JPC)RWL) -against- JUDGMENT WILLIAM KEYSER, Respondent.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated May 13, 2021, the Court has adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is denied. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York May 13, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court

Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICKY OWENS, Petitioner, 18 CIVIL 11638 JPC)RWL) -against- JUDGMENT WILLIAM KEYSER, Respondent.

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated May 13, 2021, the Court has adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is denied. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York May 13, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court

Deputy Clerk

Owens v. Keyser, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Pincite

Owens v. Keyser (Owens v. Keyser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related