Home/Supreme Court/Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Danfield

Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Danfield

485 U.S. 1029, 108 S. Ct. 1586, 99 L. Ed. 2d 901, 56 U.S.L.W. 3737, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 1963
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 25, 1988
DocketNo. 87-1472
StatusPublished
Cited by85 cases

This text of 485 U.S. 1029 (Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Danfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Danfield, 485 U.S. 1029, 108 S. Ct. 1586, 99 L. Ed. 2d 901, 56 U.S.L.W. 3737, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 1963 (1988).

Opinion

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Riley v. Cockrell
215 F. Supp. 2d 765 (E.D. Texas, 2002)
Jones v. State
982 S.W.2d 386 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Calderon v. State
950 S.W.2d 121 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Rhoades v. State
934 S.W.2d 113 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)
United States v. David A. Pless
79 F.3d 1217 (D.C. Circuit, 1996)
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 671, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1017 the People of the State of California Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission ("Papuc") Southern California Coalition on Battered Women Toward Utility Rate Normalization ("Turn") Consumer Federation of America Consumer Action the National Association of Social Workers ("Nasw") the California Alliance Against Domestic Violence the Family Violence Prevention Fund Petitioners-Intervenors v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America Us West Communications MCI Telecommunications Corporation Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee ("Committee") at & T Corporation the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners National Association of Consumer Advocates (Nasuca), Ameritech Operating Companies Southwestern Bell Telephone Company Pacific Bell United States Telephone Association (Usta) Bellsouth Corporation Respondents-Intervenors. The People of the State of California Public Utilities Commission of the State of California Consumer Federation of America Southern California Coalition on Battered Women National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners ("Naruc") Toward Utility Rate Normalization ("Turn") California Alliance Against Domestic Violence the Family Violence Prevention Fund ("Fund") Consumer Action National Association of Social Workers ("Nasw") and the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission ("Papuc") Petitioners-Intervenors v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. ("Bellsouth") Southwestern Bell Telephone Company National Telephone Cooperative Association Gte California Incorporated (Hereinafter "Gtec") MCI Telecommunications Corporation the United States Telephone Association ("Usta") Us West Communications Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee Respondents-Intervenors. At & T Corporation, MCI Telecommunications Corporation Consumer Federation of America Consumer Action National Association of Social Workers California Alliance Against Domestic Violence the Family Violence Prevention Fund Southern California Coalition of Battered Women Petitioners-Intervenors v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America Southwestern Bell Telephone Company ("Southwestern Bell") National Telephone Cooperative Association Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies ("Bell Atlantic") Ameritech Gte Service Corporation ("Gte") Respondents-Intervenors. Competitive Telecommunications Association Consumer Federation of America, California Alliance Against Domestic Violence & the Family Violence Prevention Fund Petitioners-Intervenors v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America
75 F.3d 1350 (Ninth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Sirang
70 F.3d 588 (Eleventh Circuit, 1995)
Jenkins v. State
912 S.W.2d 793 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)
State Office of Protection & Advocacy v. Miller
65 F.3d 176 (Ninth Circuit, 1995)
Alliance for Community Media Alliance for Communications Democracy People for the American Way v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, New York Citizens Committee for Responsible Media Media Access New York Brooklyn Producers' Group David Channon National Cable Television Association, Inc., Intervenors. Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. American Civil Liberties Union v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, New York Citizens Committee for Responsible Media Media Access New York Brooklyn Producers' Group David Channon National Cable Television Association, Inc., Intervenors. Alliance for Community Media Alliance for Communications Democracy People for the American Way v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, New York Citizens Committee for Responsible Media Media Access New York Brooklyn Producers' Group David Channon National Cable Television Association, Inc., Intervenors. American Civil Liberties Union v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, New York Citizens Committee for Responsible Media Media Access New York Brooklyn Producers' Group David Channon National Cable Television Association, Inc., Intervenors
56 F.3d 105 (D.C. Circuit, 1995)
Valencia v. State
891 S.W.2d 652 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Smith v. State
898 S.W.2d 838 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1995)
United States v. Robert Longfellow
43 F.3d 318 (Seventh Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Louis T. Mancuso, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Robert S. Schmidt, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Susan L. Mancuso, (Two Cases). United States of America v. R. Philip Hartman, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Hartman Rack Products, Incorporated, United States of America v. Louis T. Mancuso, Robert S. Schmidt Susan L. Mancuso R. Philip Hartman Hartman Rack Products, Incorporated
42 F.3d 836 (Fourth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Robert Joseph Carr, Jr., in No. 93-1376. United States of America v. Walter Orlando Cardona-Usquiano, in No. 93-1383
25 F.3d 1194 (Third Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Harriet Rimell, United States of America v. Albert Rimell
21 F.3d 281 (Eighth Circuit, 1994)
Burks v. State
876 S.W.2d 877 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Alliance for Community Media the Alliance for Communications Democracy People for the American Way v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, New York Citizens Committee for Responsible Media Media Access New York Brooklyn Producers' Group David Channon National Cable Television Association, Inc., Intervenors (Two Cases). Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium American Civil Liberties Union v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, New York Citizens Committee for Responsible Media Media Access New York Brooklyn Producers' Group David Channon National Cable Television Association, Inc., Intervenors, Morality in Media, Amicus Curiae. American Civil Liberties Union v. Federal Communications Commission United States of America, New York Citizens Committee for Responsible Media Media Access New York Brooklyn Producers' Group David Channon National Cable Television Association, Inc., Intervenors, National Law Center for Children and Families National Legal Foundation, Amici Curiae
10 F.3d 812 (D.C. Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Brandon
17 F.3d 409 (First Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Peter Brandon, United States of America v. Charles D. Gauvin, United States of America v. Marvin Granoff, United States of America v. Ronald R. Hagopian, United States of America v. Momi A. Kumalae, United States of America v. Owen B. Landman, United States of America v. Norman D. Reisch, United States of America v. John Ward
17 F.3d 409 (First Circuit, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
485 U.S. 1029, 108 S. Ct. 1586, 99 L. Ed. 2d 901, 56 U.S.L.W. 3737, 1988 U.S. LEXIS 1963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owens-illinois-inc-v-danfield-scotus-1988.