Owen v. Arizona
This text of 378 U.S. 574 (Owen v. Arizona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OWEN ET AL.
v.
ARIZONA.
Supreme Court of United States.
Petitioners pro se.
Robert W. Pickrell, Attorney General of Arizona, and Norman E. Green for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Arizona are vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.
MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
378 U.S. 574, 84 S. Ct. 1932, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1041, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owen-v-arizona-scotus-1964.