Owen v. Arizona

378 U.S. 574, 84 S. Ct. 1932, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1041, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 861
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJune 22, 1964
Docket1078, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 378 U.S. 574 (Owen v. Arizona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Owen v. Arizona, 378 U.S. 574, 84 S. Ct. 1932, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1041, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 861 (1964).

Opinion

378 U.S. 574 (1964)

OWEN ET AL.
v.
ARIZONA.

No. 1078, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 22, 1964.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.

Petitioners pro se.

Robert W. Pickrell, Attorney General of Arizona, and Norman E. Green for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Arizona are vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ussery
452 S.W.2d 146 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1970)
Morales v. Bencic
467 P.2d 752 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1970)
Duguay v. State
240 A.2d 738 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1968)
State v. Owen
416 P.2d 589 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
378 U.S. 574, 84 S. Ct. 1932, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1041, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/owen-v-arizona-scotus-1964.