Home/Supreme Court/Owen v. Arizona

Owen v. Arizona

378 U.S. 574, 84 S. Ct. 1932, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1041, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 861
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 22, 1964·No. 1078, Misc·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

378 U.S. 574 (1964)

OWEN ET AL.
v.
ARIZONA.

No. 1078, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 22, 1964.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.

Petitioners pro se.

Robert W. Pickrell, Attorney General of Arizona, and Norman E. Green for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgments of the Supreme Court of Arizona are vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Owen v. Arizona, 378 U.S. 574, 84 S. Ct. 1932, 12 L. Ed. 2d 1041, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 861 (1964).

378 U.S. 574 (Owen v. Arizona) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ussery
452 S.W.2d 146 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1970)
Morales v. Bencic
467 P.2d 752 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1970)
United States of America Ex Rel. James Edward Hill v. Warren Pinto, Superintendent New Jersey State Prison Farm, Rahway, New Jersey
394 F.2d 470 (Third Circuit, 1968)
Duguay v. State
240 A.2d 738 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1968)
Ernest Paul Maldonado v. Frank A. Eyman, Warden, Arizona State Prison
377 F.2d 526 (Ninth Circuit, 1967)
State v. Owen
416 P.2d 589 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1966)