Overseas Equipment Co. v. Aceros Arquitectonicos

376 So. 2d 475, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16070
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 7, 1979
DocketNo. 78-1992
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 376 So. 2d 475 (Overseas Equipment Co. v. Aceros Arquitectonicos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Overseas Equipment Co. v. Aceros Arquitectonicos, 376 So. 2d 475, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16070 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This court, in a prior opinion [see: Overseas Equipment Co., Inc. v. Aceros Arquitectónicos, 374 So.2d 537 (Fla.App. 3d DCA 1979)], reversed a $50,000.00 punitive damages award awarded to the appellee, Aceros Arquitectónicos, and affirmed a $20,000.00 compensatory award. The cause then reoccurred in the trial court by Overseas Equipment filing a motion to tax appellate cost the trial court denied.

In relation to costs, the appellate rules provide:

“Rule 9.400. Costs and Attorney’s Fees (a) Costs. Costs shall be taxed in favor of the prevailing party unless the court orders otherwise. Taxable costs shall include:
(1) fees for filing and service of process;
(2) charges for preparation of the record;
(3) bond premiums; and
(4) other costs permitted by law.
Costs shall be taxed by the lower tribunal on motion served within 30 days after issuance of the mandate.”

[476]*476The mandate from this court provided, in part, as follows:

“YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED that such further proceedings be had in said cause in accordance with the opinion of this Court attached hereto and incorporated as part of this order, and with the rules of procedure and laws of the State of Florida.”

Overseas Equipment having been the substantially prevailing party in the appellate proceedings, it should have been accorded its appellate costs. Therefore, the order under review be and the same is hereby reversed, with directions to enter a cost judgment in favor of Overseas Equipment Co., Inc., in accordance with its motion.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Milio v. Leinoff & Silvers
683 So. 2d 608 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
N. Am. Van Lines v. FERGUSON TRANSP.
662 So. 2d 1275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Kirkland v. Kirkland
618 So. 2d 295 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
376 So. 2d 475, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 16070, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overseas-equipment-co-v-aceros-arquitectonicos-fladistctapp-1979.