Milio v. Leinoff & Silvers
This text of 683 So. 2d 608 (Milio v. Leinoff & Silvers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION ON MOTION TO REVIEW ORDER
The final order of the trial court denying Vincent Milio’s motion for appellate costs following the successful prosecution of his appeal in Milio v. Leinoff & Silvers, P.A., 668 So.2d 1108 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), is reversed and this case is remanded to the trial court for a determination of the amount to be [609]*609taxed, and the award of same. See Overseas Equip. Co., Inc. v. Aceros Arquitectonicos, 376 So.2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied 383 So.2d 1189 (Fla.1980); Fla. R.App. P. 9.400(a).
Reversed and remanded.
BARKDULL and NESBITT, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
683 So. 2d 608, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12287, 1996 WL 670263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milio-v-leinoff-silvers-fladistctapp-1996.