Milio v. Leinoff & Silvers

683 So. 2d 608, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12287, 1996 WL 670263
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 20, 1996·No. No. 95-2507·Published

Opinions

OPINION ON MOTION TO REVIEW ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The final order of the trial court denying Vincent Milio’s motion for appellate costs following the successful prosecution of his appeal in Milio v. Leinoff & Silvers, P.A., 668 So.2d 1108 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), is reversed and this case is remanded to the trial court for a determination of the amount to be [609] taxed, and the award of same. See Overseas Equip. Co., Inc. v. Aceros Arquitectonicos, 376 So.2d 475 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied 383 So.2d 1189 (Fla.1980); Fla. R.App. P. 9.400(a).

Reversed and remanded.

BARKDULL and NESBITT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Milio v. Leinoff & Silvers, 683 So. 2d 608, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 12287, 1996 WL 670263 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

683 So. 2d 608 (Milio v. Leinoff & Silvers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

General Capital Corporation v. Tel Service Co.
239 So. 2d 134 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Milio v. LEINOFF AND SILVERS, PA
668 So. 2d 1108 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Overseas Equipment Co. v. Aceros Arquitectonicos
376 So. 2d 475 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Futch v. Head
566 So. 2d 862 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)