Overholser v. Clark

1 Thompson 49
CourtTennessee Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1850
StatusPublished
Cited by66 cases

This text of 1 Thompson 49 (Overholser v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Overholser v. Clark, 1 Thompson 49 (Tenn. 1850).

Opinion

McKinney, J.,

delivered an oral opinion, in which it was held, on the authority of Bettis v. Mansfield, 11 Humph. 604, that the rule expired at the term at which,' by its terms, the plaintiff was to comply with it. If the defendant fails to dispose of it in some way at that term, he cannot do it afterwards ; and this whether the Court is held or not.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thompson v. Town of Jonesboro
222 So. 3d 770 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2017)
State v. Hust
214 So. 3d 174 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2017)
State v. Breedlove
213 So. 3d 1195 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2017)
State v. Thompson
163 So. 3d 139 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)
Cade v. Cosgrove
430 S.W.3d 488 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2014)
Spicer v. Kimes
156 S.W.2d 334 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1941)
Blair v. Travelers Insurance
197 N.E. 60 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1935)
Brown v. Loewenbach
258 N.W. 379 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1935)
Brower v. Employers' Liability Assurance Co.
177 A. 826 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1935)
Lasch v. Columbus Heating & Ventilating Co.
163 S.E. 486 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1932)
Barber v. Hartley
298 P. 226 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1931)
Rowland v. Griffin
16 S.W.2d 457 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1929)
Edney v. Jensen
216 N.W. 812 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1927)
Rouse v. Zimmerman
212 N.W. 515 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1927)
Purdom v. Broach
275 S.W. 365 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1925)
State Ex Rel. Ford v. Ellison
230 S.W. 637 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1921)
Fifield v. Mayer
104 A. 887 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1918)
Boley v. Daniel
72 Fla. 121 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1916)
Shapard v. Mixon
184 S.W. 399 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1916)
Grubbs v. Eddleman
179 S.W. 91 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Thompson 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overholser-v-clark-tenn-1850.