Overhead Railway & Switch Co. v. Hiller
This text of 98 F. 620 (Overhead Railway & Switch Co. v. Hiller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff’s application for a preliminary injunction has not been adequately supported. It is necessary only to read the opinion in the case of Manufacturing Co. v. Roden (C. C.) 98 Fed. 619, to perceive that its decision ought not to be regarded as conclusive. The question respecting the validity of the patent, as it is now presented, is at least a serious one, and the force of the evidehce of anticipation which has been presented is not substantially opposed by anything to be found in the moving papers. Neither has infringement been satisfactorily shown. The motion for a preliminary injunction is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 F. 620, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/overhead-railway-switch-co-v-hiller-circtedpa-1899.