Outler v. Conley

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Outler v. Conley. Read the opinion of the Court — 112 F. App'x 284
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 13, 2002·No. 01-7974·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7974

RAYMOND OUTLER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOYCE K. CONLEY,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-99-213)

Submitted: April 9, 2002 Decided: June 13, 2002

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Outler, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Raymond Outler appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we grant Outler’s motion to proceed on appeal

in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Outler v. Conley, No. CA-99-213 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 7,

2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Outler v. Conley, (4th Cir. 2002).

Outler v. Conley (Outler v. Conley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241