Outler v. Conley
This text of 36 F. App'x 525 (Outler v. Conley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Raymond Outler appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have [526]*526reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Outler’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Outlet v. Conley, No. CA-99-213 (S.D.W.Va. Nov. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 F. App'x 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/outler-v-conley-ca4-2002.