Outlaw v. City of Asheville
1 S.E.2d 559, 215 N.C. 790, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 372
Opinion
The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Winborne, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed as the disposition of this appeal without becoming a precedent, in accordance with the practice of the Court. Mills v. Jones, 213 N. C., 802.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Outlaw v. City of Asheville, 1 S.E.2d 559, 215 N.C. 790, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 372 (N.C. 1939).
1 S.E.2d 559 (Outlaw v. City of Asheville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whichard v. Lipe
223 N.C. 856 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)
Adams v. . Murphrey
19 S.E.2d 250 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Elmore v. . General Amusements
19 S.E.2d 5 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)