Outlaw v. City of Asheville

1 S.E.2d 559, 215 N.C. 790, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 372
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 8, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 1 S.E.2d 559 (Outlaw v. City of Asheville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Outlaw v. City of Asheville, 1 S.E.2d 559, 215 N.C. 790, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 372 (N.C. 1939).

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Winborne, J., not sitting, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed as the disposition of this appeal without becoming a precedent, in accordance with the practice of the Court. Mills v. Jones, 213 N. C., 802.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whichard v. Lipe
223 N.C. 856 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1943)
Adams v. . Murphrey
19 S.E.2d 250 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Elmore v. . General Amusements
19 S.E.2d 5 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 S.E.2d 559, 215 N.C. 790, 1939 N.C. LEXIS 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/outlaw-v-city-of-asheville-nc-1939.