Adams v. . Murphrey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Adams v. . Murphrey

19 S.E.2d 250, 221 N.C. 165

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMarch 25, 1942

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 S.E.2d 250 (Adams v. . Murphrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Adams v. . Murphrey, 19 S.E.2d 250, 221 N.C. 165 (N.C. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee CuRiam.

One member of the Court, Schenck, J., not sitting, and the remaining six being evenly divided in opinion whether, in the circumstances, error was committed in allowing the jury to view the premises of the defendants and to observe the processes of operation, Highway Com. v. Hartley, 218 N. C., 438, 11 S. E. (2d), 314, the judgment of the Superior Court stands affirmed as the disposition of this appeal without becoming a precedent, accordant with the usual practice in such cases. Outlaw v. Asheville, 215 N. C., 790, 1 S. E. (2d), 559.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee CuRiam.

One member of the Court, Schenck, J., not sitting, and the remaining six being evenly divided in opinion whether, in the circumstances, error was committed in allowing the jury to view the premises of the defendants and to observe the processes of operation, Highway Com. v. Hartley, 218 N. C., 438, 11 S. E. (2d), 314, the judgment of the Superior Court stands affirmed as the disposition of this appeal without becoming a precedent, accordant with the usual practice in such cases. Outlaw v. Asheville, 215 N. C., 790, 1 S. E. (2d), 559.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 S.E.2d 250, 221 N.C. 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/adams-v-murphrey-nc-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack