Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. DG in PB, LLC

District Court, S.D. California·Decided March 5, 2021·No. 3:18-cv-00840·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IN RE OUTLAW LABORATORIES, LP Case No.: 18-cv-840-GPC-BGS LITIGATION 12 SCHEDULING ORDER 13 [ECF No. 290] 14 15 16 17 Pending before this Court is a Settlement between the “Stores” (consisting of 18 Counterclaimant Roma Mikha, Inc., and Third-Party Plaintiffs NMRM, Inc. and Skyline 19 Market, Inc.) and “Outlaw Defendants” (consisting of Outlaw Laboratory, LP, Michael 20 Wear, and Shawn Lynch). On September 15, 2020, the Court issued an Order which 21 directed the Stores to produce a copy of the Settlement so that the Court may assess 22 whether notice of the Settlement would be required under Diaz v. Tr. Territory of Pac. 23 Islands, 876 F.2d 1401 (9th Cir. 1989). ECF No. 290. 24 After production of the Settlement, the litigating parties also presented 25 supplemental briefs pursuant to the same Order. Upon review of the briefs, the Court 26 now schedules a hearing on this matter for March 12, 2021 at 1:30 PM. The hearing will 27 1 || be conducted telephonically, with the relevant information to be provided in a separate 2 || order. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 || Dated: March 5, 2021 Carseto C4 6 Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 7 United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 18-cv-840-GPC-BGS

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. DG in PB, LLC, (S.D. Cal. 2021).

Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. DG in PB, LLC (Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. DG in PB, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.