Outerbridge v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Outerbridge v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Read the opinion of the Court — 390 F. App'x 209
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2010·No. 10-1442·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1442

SHENAE A. OUTERBRIDGE,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 7907-08)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 4, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shenae A. Outerbridge, Appellant Pro Se. John DiCicco, Kenneth W. Rosenberg, Bridget Maria Rowan, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; William J. Wilkins, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Shenae A. Outerbridge appeals from the tax court’s

order disallowing her claimed business expenses and determining

a deficiency in her 2006 income tax. We have reviewed the

record and the tax court’s opinion and find no abuse of

discretion and no clear error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the tax court. Outerbridge v. Comm’r of

Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 7907-08 (U.S.T.C. July 21, 2009 &

Jan. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Outerbridge v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (4th Cir. 2010).

Outerbridge v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Outerbridge v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.