Outerbridge v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1442
SHENAE A. OUTERBRIDGE,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 7907-08)
Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 4, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shenae A. Outerbridge, Appellant Pro Se. John DiCicco, Kenneth W. Rosenberg, Bridget Maria Rowan, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; William J. Wilkins, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Shenae A. Outerbridge appeals from the tax court’s
order disallowing her claimed business expenses and determining
a deficiency in her 2006 income tax. We have reviewed the
record and the tax court’s opinion and find no abuse of
discretion and no clear error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the tax court. Outerbridge v. Comm’r of
Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 7907-08 (U.S.T.C. July 21, 2009 &
Jan. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Outerbridge v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Outerbridge v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.