Outerbridge v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

390 F. App'x 209
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2010·No. No. 10-1442·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Shenae A. Outerbridge appeals from the tax court’s order disallowing her claimed business expenses and determining a deficiency in her 2006 income tax. We have reviewed the record and the tax court’s opinion and find no abuse of discretion and no clear error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Out-erbridge v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, Tax Ct. No. 7907-08, 2009 WL 2169870 (U.S.T.C. July 21, 2009) & (Jan. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Outerbridge v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 390 F. App'x 209 (4th Cir. 2010).

390 F. App'x 209 (Outerbridge v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owens v. Comm'r
2010 T.C. Memo. 265 (U.S. Tax Court, 2010)