Outdoor Supply Co. v. Westhome Security Corp.

140 Misc. 48, 249 N.Y.S. 571, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1259
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedApril 30, 1931
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 140 Misc. 48 (Outdoor Supply Co. v. Westhome Security Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Outdoor Supply Co. v. Westhome Security Corp., 140 Misc. 48, 249 N.Y.S. 571, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1259 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Section 220 of the Civil Practice Act, which provides: “ The summons may be served by any person of the age of eighteen years or over, other than a party to the action,” does not, in our view, preclude service by an officer or director of a plaintiff corporation. As was said in Woods v. DeFiganiere (1 Robt. [24 N. Y. Super. Ct.] 607, atp. 611): All the provisions of the Code, as a general rule, when treating of parties to the action, mean only the parties to the record, whether nominal parties, or the actual parties in interest.” This decision was cited with approval in People of State of New York v. Mutual Gas Light Co. (74 N. Y. 434, at p. 435). In the latter case the Court of Appeals in determin[49]*49ing the meaning of the word ec party n in connection with examinations before trial said, “ the word 1 party/ as used in this and previous similar statutes, has an unmistakable meaning. It means a plaintiff or defendant, and cannot be extended to the officers, servants, agents and employees of the parties, whether such parties be corporations or natural persons,”

We see no sufficient reason for applying a different meaning to the word “ party ” under this section than that generally applied b;?- the courts with respect to it.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with leave to the defendant to answer within six days after service of order entered hereon upon payment of said costs.

All concur; present, Levy, Callahan and Peters, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eisenhauer v. Sarrabia
178 Misc. 2d 95 (Nassau County District Court, 1998)
Grid Realty Corp. v. Gialousakis
129 A.D.2d 768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
H. D. S. Mercantile Corp. v. Monet Fashions, Inc.
37 Misc. 2d 82 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Donnelly v. Donnelly
29 Misc. 2d 469 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Sharp Paper & Specialty Co. v. Fernández
60 P.R. 641 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1942)
Miehl v. South Central Securities Co.
58 S.W.2d 1011 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 Misc. 48, 249 N.Y.S. 571, 1931 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/outdoor-supply-co-v-westhome-security-corp-nyappterm-1931.