Oullahan v. Morrissey

14 P. 864, 73 Cal. 297, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 663
California Supreme Court·Decided August 30, 1887·No. No. 11393·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

The Court.

— The plaintiff, having consented to the entry of the judgment against himself, cannot appeal from it, or if he can, can be heard only as to that portion to which he did not consent. That in this case is at the most the demand for costs, which, being less than three hundred dollars, does not give this court jurisdiction.

The appeal must be dismissed.

So ordered.'

McKinstry, J., expressed no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oullahan v. Morrissey, 14 P. 864, 73 Cal. 297, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 663 (Cal. 1887).

14 P. 864 (Oullahan v. Morrissey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estate of Barrett v. Commissioner
56 T.C. 1312 (U.S. Tax Court, 1971)
Waldrop v. Maser
30 P.2d 83 (Montana Supreme Court, 1934)
Judnick v. Judnick
190 P. 480 (California Court of Appeal, 1920)
Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. Waymire
92 P. 645 (California Supreme Court, 1907)
Southern California Railway Co. v. Superior Court
59 P. 789 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Fairbanks v. Lampkin
34 P. 101 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Sellick v. De Carlow
30 P. 795 (California Supreme Court, 1892)