Oullahan v. Morrissey
14 P. 864, 73 Cal. 297, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 663
This text of 14 P. 864 (Oullahan v. Morrissey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Oullahan v. Morrissey, 14 P. 864, 73 Cal. 297, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 663 (Cal. 1887).
Opinion
— The plaintiff, having consented to the entry of the judgment against himself, cannot appeal from it, or if he can, can be heard only as to that portion to which he did not consent. That in this case is at the most the demand for costs, which, being less than three hundred dollars, does not give this court jurisdiction.
The appeal must be dismissed.
So ordered.'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Estate of Barrett v. Commissioner
56 T.C. 1312 (U.S. Tax Court, 1971)
Waldrop v. Maser
30 P.2d 83 (Montana Supreme Court, 1934)
Judnick v. Judnick
190 P. 480 (California Court of Appeal, 1920)
Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. Waymire
92 P. 645 (California Supreme Court, 1907)
Southern California Railway Co. v. Superior Court
59 P. 789 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Fairbanks v. Lampkin
34 P. 101 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
Sellick v. De Carlow
30 P. 795 (California Supreme Court, 1892)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
14 P. 864, 73 Cal. 297, 1887 Cal. LEXIS 663, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oullahan-v-morrissey-cal-1887.