Ouida Sue Parker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.

107 F.3d 359, 6 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 547, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 2161, 1997 WL 57116
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 6, 1997·No. 95-5269·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en bane shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court are vacated, the mandate is stayed and the case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

It is further ORDERED that the appellant file a supplemental brief not later than Wednesday, March 5, 1997, and the appellees file a supplemental brief not later than Friday, April 4,1997. Reargument will be scheduled for Wednesday, June 11,1997.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ouida Sue Parker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 107 F.3d 359, 6 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 547, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 2161, 1997 WL 57116 (6th Cir. 1997).

107 F.3d 359 (Ouida Sue Parker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hosaflook v. Consolidation Coal Co.
497 S.E.2d 174 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1997)
Parker v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
121 F.3d 1006 (Sixth Circuit, 1997)