Otey Brown v. San Alberto Cia Armadora S.A. v. Independent Pier Company

305 F.2d 288, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4780
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedJune 15, 1962
Docket13852_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 305 F.2d 288 (Otey Brown v. San Alberto Cia Armadora S.A. v. Independent Pier Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Otey Brown v. San Alberto Cia Armadora S.A. v. Independent Pier Company, 305 F.2d 288, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4780 (3d Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A jury awarded plaintiff $9,000 for damage arising out of an accident which: occurred on December 27, 1957, while plaintiff was performing duties as a longshoreman. In support of a motion for a new trial on the issue of damages, which the district court denied, plaintiff contended, as he does here, that the court erroneously charged on two points, to-wit: the jury was charged not to award compensatory damages for any period after plaintiff would have retired, and that *289 damages could be awarded beyond June of 1958 only if the jury accepted the testimony of one of plaintiff’s medical experts that plaintiff suffered a herniated disc. This, plaintiff urges, was to so circumscribe the issues as to deny him the recovery which the evidence required.

We think that the charge, when read in its entirety, was fair and complete, and that it accurately presented to the jury both of the issues here questioned.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
305 F.2d 288, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/otey-brown-v-san-alberto-cia-armadora-sa-v-independent-pier-company-ca3-1962.