Oswego Hydro Partners L.P. v. Phoenix Hydro Corp.
163 A.D.2d 829, 559 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9495
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 13, 1990·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Petitioner was not required to plead or prove, as a prerequisite to the acquisition of property by eminent domain, that it negotiated in good faith with the owner (see, Matter of Consolidated Edison Co. [Neptune Assocs.], 143 AD2d 1012, 1014). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Reagan, J.—condemnation.) Present —Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oswego Hydro Partners L.P. v. Phoenix Hydro Corp., 163 A.D.2d 829, 559 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9495 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
163 A.D.2d 829 (Oswego Hydro Partners L.P. v. Phoenix Hydro Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Acquisition of Real Property by the Village of Saranac Lake
93 A.D.3d 971 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation v. Town of Concord
299 A.D.2d 898 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)