Ostrica Oyster Co. v. Barbier

54 So. 794, 128 La. 268, 1911 La. LEXIS 552
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 27, 1911
DocketNo. 18,207
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 54 So. 794 (Ostrica Oyster Co. v. Barbier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ostrica Oyster Co. v. Barbier, 54 So. 794, 128 La. 268, 1911 La. LEXIS 552 (La. 1911).

Opinion

MONROE, J.

The Ostrica Oyster Company, Limited, brought this suit against a [269]*269number, of persons, alleging that they had unlawfully prevented it (the company) from shipping a lot of oysters from the parish of Plaquemines to New Orleans, by reason whereof part of the oysters were lost and other damages were sustained, to the amount, in the aggregate, of $401.22%, to which plaintiff added a claim of $2,000 for exemplary damages. Subsequently Anthony Tomasovich joined with the company as party plaintiff, and after hearing there was judgment in the district court in favor of plaintiffs, and against certain of the defendants, in the sum of $309.75, with interest. The defendants who were cast have appealed, and plaintiffs have answered, praying for an increase in the amount of the award. Our inspection of the record leads us to the conclusion that the claim for exemplary damages is very much exaggerated, and that any amount that plaintiffs could reasonably expect to recover, on that count, added to their claim for actual damages, would leave the amount really involved below $2,000, and hence below the amount necessary to give this court jurisdiction of the appeal.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal in this case be transferred to the Court of Appeal for the parish of Orleans, provided that, before said transfer is made, and within five days after this judgment shall have become final, the appellants, or their attorney of record, shall make oath that their appeal was not taken for the purpose of delay; otherwise, said appeal shall be held dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Westfall v. McCullough
187 So. 839 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1939)
Ostrica Oyster Co. v. Barbier
56 So. 422 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 So. 794, 128 La. 268, 1911 La. LEXIS 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ostrica-oyster-co-v-barbier-la-1911.