Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/O'Steen v. State

O'Steen v. State

172 So. 3d 556, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12460, 2015 WL 4926106
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 19, 2015
DocketNo. 1D15-2328
StatusPublished

This text of 172 So. 3d 556 (O'Steen v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Steen v. State, 172 So. 3d 556, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12460, 2015 WL 4926106 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed in part as moot, and is denied in part under the authority of Munn v. Florida Parole Commission, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

SWANSON, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Munn v. Florida Parole Commission
807 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
172 So. 3d 556, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12460, 2015 WL 4926106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osteen-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.