Ossen v. Wanat
This text of 574 A.2d 219 (Ossen v. Wanat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 21 Conn. App. 40, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court err in holding that the constitutional issues raised by the defendants need not have been considered by the trial court in a summary process action?
“2. Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the motion of the defendants to sell their mobile home on the leased premises pursuant to General Statutes § 21-79 during the pendency of the summary process action was properly denied?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
574 A.2d 219, 215 Conn. 804, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ossen-v-wanat-conn-1990.