Ositadinma Okeke v. Momah

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ositadinma Okeke v. Momah

132 A.D.3d 648, 17 N.Y.S.3d 305

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 7, 2015

Docket2013-09017

StatusPublished

This text of 132 A.D.3d 648 (Ositadinma Okeke v. Momah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ositadinma Okeke v. Momah, 132 A.D.3d 648, 17 N.Y.S.3d 305 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, the plaintiff Ositadinma Okeke appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), dated August 14, 2013, which denied his motion to disqualify the defendants’ attorney from representing the defendants in this action and denied his separate motion for a preliminary injunction.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs.

In light of our determination that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction was properly granted (see Okeke v Momah, 132 AD3d 648 [2015] [decided herewith]), we dismiss the instant appeal as academic (see Goldbourne v Williams, 175 AD2d 860 [1991]).

Rivera, J.P., Roman, LaSalle and Barros, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, for a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief, the plaintiff Ositadinma Okeke appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), dated August 14, 2013, which denied his motion to disqualify the defendants’ attorney from representing the defendants in this action and denied his separate motion for a preliminary injunction.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs.

In light of our determination that the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction was properly granted (see Okeke v Momah, 132 AD3d 648 [2015] [decided herewith]), we dismiss the instant appeal as academic (see Goldbourne v Williams, 175 AD2d 860 [1991]).

Rivera, J.P., Roman, LaSalle and Barros, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 A.D.3d 648, 17 N.Y.S.3d 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ositadinma-okeke-v-momah-nyappdiv-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack