Oscar Schlegel Manufacturing Co. v. Sternon

74 Misc. 89, 131 N.Y.S. 650
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided November 15, 1911·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from an order granting the motion of the plaintiff to amend the name of the defendant and also from an order denying defendant’s motion for a reargument. Neither of these orders is appealable. Lyons v. Mulvihill, 128 N. Y. Supp. 653.

Appeal dismissed with ten dollars costs.

Present: Seabury, Guy and Cohalan, JJ.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oscar Schlegel Manufacturing Co. v. Sternon, 74 Misc. 89, 131 N.Y.S. 650 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

74 Misc. 89 (Oscar Schlegel Manufacturing Co. v. Sternon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Hermann
11 Mills Surr. 356 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1913)