Lyons v. Mulvihill

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Lyons v. Mulvihill

128 N.Y.S. 653

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedApril 8, 1911

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 128 N.Y.S. 653 (Lyons v. Mulvihill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lyons v. Mulvihill, 128 N.Y.S. 653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order from which the defendant appeals is not appealable under sections 253, 254, 255, 256, and 257 of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, c. 580). We have no jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an order, as distinct from a judgment, except as such jurisdiction is given to this court by those sections. Spiegelman v. Union Ry. Co., 95 App. Div. 92, 88 N. Y. Supp. 478; Ducas Co. v. Continental Finishing Co., 65 Misc. Rep. 42, 119 N. Y. Supp. 429.

Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order from which the defendant appeals is not appealable under sections 253, 254, 255, 256, and 257 of the Municipal Court act (Laws 1902, c. 580). We have no jurisdiction to consider an appeal from an order, as distinct from a judgment, except as such jurisdiction is given to this court by those sections. Spiegelman v. Union Ry. Co., 95 App. Div. 92, 88 N. Y. Supp. 478; Ducas Co. v. Continental Finishing Co., 65 Misc. Rep. 42, 119 N. Y. Supp. 429.

Appeal dismissed, with $10 costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 N.Y.S. 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lyons-v-mulvihill-nyappterm-1911.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack