Oscar Barnett Foundry Co. v. Crowe

86 A. 915, 80 N.J. Eq. 258, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 368
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 20, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 86 A. 915 (Oscar Barnett Foundry Co. v. Crowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oscar Barnett Foundry Co. v. Crowe, 86 A. 915, 80 N.J. Eq. 258, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 368 (N.J. 1912).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed'for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Howell.

For affirmance—The Chancellor, Garrison, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Mint urn, ICalisch, Vroom, Congdon, White —9.

For reversal—The Chief-Justice, Parker, Bergen, Voori-iees,.Bogert, Vredenbukgh, Treacy—1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Clawans
174 A.2d 367 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
Oscar Barnett Foundry Co. v. Crowe
219 F. 450 (Third Circuit, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 A. 915, 80 N.J. Eq. 258, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oscar-barnett-foundry-co-v-crowe-nj-1912.