Osbourne v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co.

389 U.S. 579
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 4, 1968·No. 768·Published·Cited by 23 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and judgment is affirmed without prejudice to the presentation of an appropriate motion in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri for a modification of the injunction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Osbourne v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co., 389 U.S. 579 (1968).

389 U.S. 579 (Osbourne v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New Hampshire Insurance v. Juelle
11 T.C.A. 1107 (Tribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico, 2006)
Mei Ying Fong v. Ashcroft
317 F. Supp. 2d 398 (S.D. New York, 2004)
United States v. Hardage
58 F.3d 569 (Tenth Circuit, 1995)
Dennis Anderson v. Gilberto Romero and Arthur Douglas
42 F.3d 1121 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)
Hankins v. Finnel
759 F. Supp. 569 (W.D. Missouri, 1991)
Gregris v. Edberg
645 F. Supp. 1153 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1986)
SEC. Industry v. Bd. of Gov. of Fed. Reserve System
628 F. Supp. 1438 (District of Columbia, 1986)
Jones v. Cleland
515 F. Supp. 212 (N.D. Alabama, 1981)
United States v. City of Detroit
476 F. Supp. 512 (E.D. Michigan, 1979)
United States v. New York Telephone Co.
434 U.S. 159 (Supreme Court, 1977)
New York State Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Carey
438 F. Supp. 440 (E.D. New York, 1977)
United States v. Armour & Co.
398 U.S. 268 (Supreme Court, 1970)