Osborne v. Stone
This text of 476 So. 2d 809 (Osborne v. Stone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Milton OSBORNE, Jr.
v.
Jesse N. STONE, Jr. individually and/as President of the Southern University System; B.K. Agnihotri individually and/as Dean of Southern University School of Law; and the Southern University Board of Supervisors.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Granted. The contention of laches may not be raised by exception; assuming without deciding that laches is available in Louisiana, it may be urged only as an affirmative defense. See LSA-C.C.P. art. 1005, Comment (e). The judgments of the trial court and Court of Appeal are vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings according to law.
DIXON, C.J., concurs in the grant and reversal and remand. There is no "laches" in La., C.C. 3457. I would remand to determine whether plaintiff abandoned his position or waived his rights.
CALOGERO, J., would simply grant the writ and bring the case up.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
476 So. 2d 809, 28 Educ. L. Rep. 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborne-v-stone-la-1985.