Osborn v. . Cardeza

110 N.E. 1045, 216 N.Y. 682, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 894
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 16, 1915·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment modified so as to leave the judgment of the Special Term undisturbed as to costs incurred up to and including the rendition of the interlocutory judgment, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff in this court, and case remitted to the Supreme Court to *683 enter judgment on the taxation of costs in accordance with this decision; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Collin, Hogan, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, J J. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Osborn v. . Cardeza, 110 N.E. 1045, 216 N.Y. 682, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 894 (N.Y. 1915).

110 N.E. 1045 (Osborn v. . Cardeza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Osborn v. Cardeza
177 A.D. 929 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)