Osborn v. . Cardeza

New York Court of Appeals

Osborn v. . Cardeza

110 N.E. 1045, 216 N.Y. 682, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 894

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 16, 1915

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 110 N.E. 1045 (Osborn v. . Cardeza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osborn v. . Cardeza, 110 N.E. 1045, 216 N.Y. 682, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 894 (N.Y. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment modified so as to leave the judgment of the Special Term undisturbed as to costs incurred up to and including the rendition of the interlocutory judgment, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff in this court, and case remitted to the Supreme Court to *683 enter judgment on the taxation of costs in accordance with this decision; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Collin, Hogan, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, J J. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment modified so as to leave the judgment of the Special Term undisturbed as to costs incurred up to and including the rendition of the interlocutory judgment, and as so modified affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff in this court, and case remitted to the Supreme Court to *683 enter judgment on the taxation of costs in accordance with this decision; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Collin, Hogan, Cardozo, Seabury and Pound, J J. Not sitting: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 N.E. 1045, 216 N.Y. 682, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborn-v-cardeza-ny-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack