Osborn v. Cardeza

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Osborn v. Cardeza

177 A.D. 929

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1917

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 177 A.D. 929 (Osborn v. Cardeza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osborn v. Cardeza, 177 A.D. 929 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order modified by striking out the [930]*9305th paragraph and inserting in lieu thereof the following: Ordered, that Charles Bur stein he and hereby is appointed as receiver of the said judgment in this action to enforce and to carry into effect the said judgment as may he proper in adjustment of the rights of the parties and those of their respective attorneys, if any, thereunder, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., Not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order modified by striking out the [930]*9305th paragraph and inserting in lieu thereof the following: Ordered, that Charles Bur stein he and hereby is appointed as receiver of the said judgment in this action to enforce and to carry into effect the said judgment as may he proper in adjustment of the rights of the parties and those of their respective attorneys, if any, thereunder, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Stapleton, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred; Carr, J., Not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 A.D. 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborn-v-cardeza-nyappdiv-1917.