Osama Abdullatif v. Erpile, LLC and Ali Choudhri

Court of Appeals of Texas

Osama Abdullatif v. Erpile, LLC and Ali Choudhri

DecidedMarch 12, 2015

Docket14-14-00038-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Osama Abdullatif v. Erpile, LLC and Ali Choudhri (Osama Abdullatif v. Erpile, LLC and Ali Choudhri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osama Abdullatif v. Erpile, LLC and Ali Choudhri, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

March 12, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals OSAMA ABDULLATIF, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00038-CV V.

ERPILE, LLC AND ALI CHOUDHRI, Appellees ________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed December 20, 2013 in favor of appellees Erpile, LLC and Ali Choudhri, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore REFORM the judgment of the court below to dismiss without prejudice (1) all of intervenor Ali Choudhri’s claims; and (2) all of Osama Abdullatif’s claims, with the single exception of Abdullatif’s request for a declaration that “Abdullatif is, and has always been, the rightful owner of the membership interest in Erpile.”

We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED except as modified in this judgment.

We order appellee Ali Choudhri to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

March 12, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals OSAMA ABDULLATIF, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00038-CV V.

ERPILE, LLC AND ALI CHOUDHRI, Appellees ________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed December 20, 2013 in favor of appellees Erpile, LLC and Ali Choudhri, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore REFORM the judgment of the court below to dismiss without prejudice (1) all of intervenor Ali Choudhri’s claims; and (2) all of Osama Abdullatif’s claims, with the single exception of Abdullatif’s request for a declaration that “Abdullatif is, and has always been, the rightful owner of the membership interest in Erpile.”

We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED except as modified in this judgment.

We order appellee Ali Choudhri to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Osama Abdullatif v. Erpile, LLC and Ali Choudhri, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osama-abdullatif-v-erpile-llc-and-ali-choudhri-texapp-2015.