United States Gypsum Company v. Burt Lee Burnett

Court of Appeals of Texas

United States Gypsum Company v. Burt Lee Burnett

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 30, 2025·No. 11-24-00053-CV·Published

Opinion

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

United States Gypsum Company, * From the 1st Multicounty Court at Law of Nolan County, Trial Court No. 6423.

Vs. No. 11-24-00053-CV * May 30, 2025

Burt Lee Burnett, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we reverse the judgment of the trial court, and we render judgment dismissing the case for want of subject-matter jurisdiction. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Burt Lee Burnett.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT

United States Gypsum Company, * From the 1st Multicounty Court at Law of Nolan County, Trial Court No. 6423.

Vs. No. 11-24-00053-CV * May 30, 2025

Burt Lee Burnett, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, we reverse the judgment of the trial court, and we render judgment dismissing the case for want of subject-matter jurisdiction. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against Burt Lee Burnett.

United States Gypsum Company v. Burt Lee Burnett, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

United States Gypsum Company v. Burt Lee Burnett (United States Gypsum Company v. Burt Lee Burnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.