Orvis v. Thompson
Opinion
The license produced by the defendant below, was valid. The act of a majority of the commissioners of excise, was sufficient, and it was so considered in the case of Palmer, qui tam. &c. v. Downey, decided in this cpurt, in October term, 1801. The supervisor may, in his "discretion, associate more than two justices with him, as [502] commissioners of excise. The number is not limited by the act to three and no more. The consent of the supervisor is not indispen sable If a majority of the commissioners present sign the license, it is sufficient. The judgment below, must be reversed?
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1 Johns. 500 (Orvis v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.