Home/Supreme Court/Ortland v. United States

Ortland v. United States

522 U.S. 851, 139 L. Ed. 2d 89
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 6, 1997
DocketNo. 96-9472
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 522 U.S. 851 (Ortland v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ortland v. United States, 522 U.S. 851, 139 L. Ed. 2d 89 (1997).

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Reitmeyer
356 F.3d 1313 (Tenth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Edward Sua, United States of America v. Raymond Pulu
307 F.3d 1150 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
State v. Okubo
53 P.3d 1204 (Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 2002)
United States v. Kenneth Karl Kimler
167 F.3d 889 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8269, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,491 Shannon Paine v. City of Lompoc, a Municipality Daniel P. Ast, Individually and as a Peace Officer Timothy E. Tietjen, Individually and as a Peace Officer R.O. Herbert, Individually and as Chief of Police City of Pismo Beach, a Municipality Michael J. Lynch, Individually and as a Peace Officer L. Scott Smith, Individually and as a Peace Officer John Derohan, Individually and as a Peace Officer Michael Leitcher, Individually and as a Peace Officer Julie Carroll Individually and as a Peace Officer Robert W. Jones, Individually and as a Peace Officer Unknown Leong, Individually and as a Peace Officer Unknown Petetit, Investigator, Individually and as a Peace Officer Unknown Keesling, Sergeant Individually and as a Peace Officer Brook McMahon Individually and as a Chief of Police
160 F.3d 562 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Paine v. City of Lompoc
160 F.3d 562 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. James Howard Van Metre, United States of America v. James Howard Van Metre
150 F.3d 339 (Fourth Circuit, 1998)
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3624, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4993 Arthur Calderon, Warden v. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California
144 F.3d 618 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Calderon v. United States District Court
144 F.3d 618 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Robert E. Ladum Ronald D. Van Vliet Daniel Hong Echols Doyle Ford David C. Grigonis James R. Weaver
141 F.3d 1328 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 660, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 874 Arthur Calderon, Warden, California State Prison, San Quentin v. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Freddie Lee Taylor, Real Party in Interest
134 F.3d 981 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Calderon v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California
134 F.3d 981 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
522 U.S. 851, 139 L. Ed. 2d 89, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortland-v-united-states-scotus-1997.