Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 18, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-00171·Unknown

Opinion

WRAL GEN Y agouay ipo7o** wee WRERCPROMNICAT OY FELEP □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | pa woe. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Deeper es. LUIS D. ORTIZ, Plaintiff, 19 CIVIL 171 (LGS) -against- JUDGMENT NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. nee KX

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated August 17, 2020, the Report is ADOPTED in its entirety as the opinion of the Court. The Commissioner of Social Security's motion is treated as a motion for summary judgment and is GRANTED. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York August 18, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: W yn AV nO Deputy Cler

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security (Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)