Ortiz v. City of New York
This text of 925 N.E.2d 582 (Ortiz v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, defendant City of New York’s motion for summary judgment granted, the complaint and all cross claims against the City of New York dismissed, and certified question answered in the negative. No triable issue of fact exists as to whether the City created a dangerous condition that caused plaintiffs injuries.
Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Grapfeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
925 N.E.2d 582, 14 N.Y.3d 779, 898 N.Y.S.2d 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ortiz-v-city-of-new-york-ny-2010.