Orth v. Dorschlein

32 Mo. 366
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMarch 15, 1862
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 32 Mo. 366 (Orth v. Dorschlein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orth v. Dorschlein, 32 Mo. 366 (Mo. 1862).

Opinion

Bates, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The judgment in this case is evidently for the right party, although, under the instruction given for the plaintiffs, it may well be doubted whether the jury might not (from the evidence preserved) have found a verdict for the defendant; and although some of the instructions moved by the defendant and refused might have been given without any violation of legal propriety, yet the merits of the action are so plainly with the plaintiffs, that under that clause of the statute which forbids this court to reverse the judgment of any court unless it shall believe that error has been committed by the court below against the appellant, and materially affecting the merits of the action, we cannot reverse this judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

Judges Bay and Dryden concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carr v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
92 S.W. 874 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1906)
Caplin v. St. Louis Transit Co.
89 S.W. 338 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1905)
Moore v. Lindell Railway Co.
75 S.W. 672 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1903)
Doyle v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co.
41 S.W. 255 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1897)
Homuth v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
31 S.W. 903 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1895)
Ellerbe v. National Exchange Bank
109 Mo. 445 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1891)
MacLeod v. Skiles
81 Mo. 595 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 Mo. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orth-v-dorschlein-mo-1862.