Orth v. Bowles

156 P.2d 724, 62 Ariz. 221
CourtArizona Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 6, 1945
DocketCivil No. 4641.
StatusPublished

This text of 156 P.2d 724 (Orth v. Bowles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Orth v. Bowles, 156 P.2d 724, 62 Ariz. 221 (Ark. 1945).

Opinion

The facts in this case involve the same points of law as contained in George C. Lebeck, Doing Business as Los Angeles-Albuquerque Express, Appellant, v. State of Arizona et al., Appellees, 62 Ariz. 171, 156 P.2d 720, and the decision in the latter case will control.

The case is accordingly remanded to the Maricopa County Superior Court with directions that the order dismissing the complaint be set aside and the complaint be reinstated for further proceedings thereon in accordance with law and the opinion expressed in the above-cited case.

NOTE: Judge ARTHUR T. LaPRADE being disqualified, the Honorable Wm. G. HALL, Judge of the Superior Court of Pima County, was called to sit in his stead. *Page 222

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lebeck v. State of Arizona
156 P.2d 720 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 P.2d 724, 62 Ariz. 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/orth-v-bowles-ariz-1945.