Orth v. Bowles

Arizona Supreme Court

Orth v. Bowles

156 P.2d 724, 62 Ariz. 221, 1945 Ariz. LEXIS 179

Arizona Supreme Court·Decided March 6, 1945·No. Civil No. 4641·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts in this case involve the same points of law as contained in George C. Lebeck, Doing Business as Los Angeles-Albuquerque Express, Appellant, v. State of Arizona et al., Appellees, 62 Ariz. 171, 156 Pac. (2d) 720, and the decision in the latter case will control.

The case is accordingly remanded to the Maricopa County Superior Court with directions that the order dismissing the complaint be set aside and the complaint be reinstated for further proceedings thereon in accordance with law and the opinion, expressed in the above-cited case.

Note:- Judge ARTHUR T. LaPRADE being disqualified, the Honorable Wm. G. HALL, Judge of the Superior Court of Pima County, was called to sit in his stead.- ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The facts in this case involve the same points of law as contained in George C. Lebeck, Doing Business as Los Angeles-Albuquerque Express, Appellant, v. State of Arizona et al., Appellees, 62 Ariz. 171, 156 Pac. (2d) 720, and the decision in the latter case will control.

The case is accordingly remanded to the Maricopa County Superior Court with directions that the order dismissing the complaint be set aside and the complaint be reinstated for further proceedings thereon in accordance with law and the opinion, expressed in the above-cited case.

Note:- Judge ARTHUR T. LaPRADE being disqualified, the Honorable Wm. G. HALL, Judge of the Superior Court of Pima County, was called to sit in his stead.- ■

Orth v. Bowles, 156 P.2d 724, 62 Ariz. 221, 1945 Ariz. LEXIS 179 (Ark. 1945).

Pincite

156 P.2d 724 (Orth v. Bowles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related